What are the most upvoted users of Hacker News commenting on? Powered by the /leaders top 50 and updated every thirty minutes. Made by @jamespotterdev.
> In the hardest task I challenged GPT-5.2 it to figure out how to write a specified string to a specified path on disk, while the following protections were enabled: address space layout randomisation, non-executable memory, full RELRO, fine-grained CFI on the QuickJS binary, hardware-enforced shadow-stack, a seccomp sandbox to prevent shell execution, and a build of QuickJS where I had stripped all functionality in it for accessing the operating system and file system. To write a file you need to chain multiple function calls, but the shadow-stack prevents ROP and the sandbox prevents simply spawning a shell process to solve the problem. GPT-5.2 came up with a clever solution involving chaining 7 function calls through glibc’s exit handler mechanism.
Yikes.
That's assuming one cares about "attribution" and "people following other links on your site". I.e. that's still being a salesman, maybe with extra steps.
In the alternative case, no value is being taken, you're left exactly with what you had before - nothing gained, nothing lost - but some user somewhere gains a little. Apparently even in 2026, the concept of positive-sum exchange, is unfathomable to so many.
This is tragic, but I hope it doesn't put a damper on Spanish high-speed train development. They've really done a remarkable job building out their network in a cost-effective manner.
Buy a cheap shit android phone for under $100 and never associate it with a SIM
On the contrary - perfect security is only possible if your system is an inert rock. Or not even then, as the users could still use the rock "wrong" by beating security maximalists over their heads with it.
Also honestly TIL that TOTP are somehow supposed to also enforce a single copy of the backing token being in existence. That's not just bad UX, that feels closer to security overreach.
People in tech, especially software and security folks, tend to miss the fact that most websites with 2FA already put a heavier security burden on their users than anything else in real life. There's generally no other situation in peoples' lives that would require you to safely store for years a document that cannot be recovered or replaced when destroyed[0]. 2FA backup codes have much stricter security standard than any government ID!
And then security people are surprised there's so much pushback on passkeys.
--
[0] - The problem really manifest when you add lack of any kind of customer support willing to or capable of resolving account access issues.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/...
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14860
Robinson, C., Ortiz, A., Kim, A. (et al.). (2025) Global Renewables Watch: A Temporal Dataset of Solar and Wind Energy Derived from Satellite Imagery. Global Renewables Watch.
Buy some land and try to sell the idea to people willing to buy a lineage memorial. To prove out the idea, the question is “who cares enough to pay for it.”
https://www.familysearch.org/ might be relevant for further research.
> I have to swat other people’s hands away when they try to point something out on my screen with their pizza fingers.
How are fingerprints on iPad Pro nano texture touchscreens?
I solved this for myself when I discovered "prism glasses":
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=prism+glasses
The comfortable reading position is lying on your back on your bed (or long sofa) with a pillow under your head. You're looking upwards at the ceiling while holding the book upright on your belly.
There's even a clip-on version you can attach to existing prescription glasses.
So simple. Zero strain. You look absolutely dumb, of course, but it lets you read until your brain gets tired, not your neck or lower back or whatever.
If you want to go for truly infinite comfort, use an e-reader held upright by a stand sitting on a breakfast tray with legs placed over and around your belly, with a Bluetooth clicker for page turning. At that point, you basically might as well not even have a body...
Not a single demonstration of contrast?
We've had matte screens for a long time that don't show glare. The problem is, the blacks are much more washed-out because that light still has to go somewhere, so it's basically just being smeared across the entire display.
This page shows lots of side-by-side photos of content that is primarily white, and most of the black bits (like text) are too small to make out.
The comparison needs to use things like busy photographs with bright areas and black areas. Then you can judge how much more washed-out the black areas look.
The second photo makes the Nano texture look pretty washed-out, but sadly doesn't include the traditional glossy laptop next to it for comparison, so it's impossible to tell.
Also, in all the side-by-side photos the Nano screen looks like it's set to much brighter. So any fair comparison should have them set to equal brightness. There's no universe in which a glossy screen is going to make the white areas look darker, as they are in all these examples.
I'm very curious if/how the Nano is better, but unfortunately these photos don't do anything to demonstrate it.
So Google Search is now opt-in? Good.
Nonviolence was never proposed as a shield for activists against violence. He knew what he was up against.
Oh no no, we still have tax cuts for the wealthy, $800B in debt servicing, and $1T/year in military spending to pay for. The tariffs were a regressive tax to compensate for the tax cuts for the wealthy.
I think doing war crimes is the real betrayal of the country. But we have a president who think his personal morality is superior to international law, ratified treaties (despite the supremacy clause) and so on. This is overtly and explicitly unconstitutional.
This is interesting and unexpected if true.
My only thought is that virtually all "serious" sites tend to have robots.txt, and so not having it indicates a high likelihood of spam.
> it is white washed non-violence 'protest and vote harder' nonsense that the history books like to push
My family is largely [EDIT: South Asian] Indian. It’s really not nonsense.
> there was a very real looming rod waiting
The rod was thinly-veiled racial violence and domestic terrorism. It would have been a route towards exterminationist rhetoric and potentially action on both sides. Not civil rights.
Keep in mind, while King was in jail America was in its own telling losing the Cold War. We were behind in space. We drew a stalemate in Korea and were getting routed in Vietnam. A year earlier the Cuban missile crisis had been narrowly averted through diplomacy. King vs. Malcolm is a textbook illustration of the downsides of escalating to violence as a political tool. (And the upsides of refraining from it even if your adversary embraces it.)
Correction: it has ruled that anything AI generated is not copyrightable. That's a very important little difference and it does not mean that the production of the AI is not covered by copyright, it may well be (though proving that is going to be hard in most cases).
>This makes me a bit uncomfortable because of how close it comes to infringing on freedom of speech,
That's fine, ads should be downright forbidden and get no "freedom of speech".
Why even have an arctic airborne division if we’re not going to use it?
Plenty of more fun dynamics. For example, in some cases it becomes a way for voting for decisions one otherwise wouldn't control. If a person in position to make a decision doesn't really care about any choice in particular, seeing the prediction market lean one way would incentivize them to choose the opposite, making a short sale immediately before.
It also makes sense for the people voting: by betting against the outcome they want, they end up either a) paying for getting things their way, or b) getting consolation payoff if the decision makers pick the undesired choice.
nb: uses data from 2012 and extrapolates, would be interesting to compare to actual current data
All of these things are much more subject to the problem that effects policy generally: the law of unintended consequences. Betting on the policy, rather than an intended/expected longer-term outcome that is easily derailed by intervening events outside of your direct control is much more direct (plus, if you are corrupt enough to bet on policy you control, that policy is probably already seeking a longer-term aim that serves your existing financial interests, so the ability to bet on the policy itself makes the corruption more attractive by providing a more immediate and certain payoff on top of the longer-term, less certain one.)
This gets into a philosophical point about what a prediction market actually is. If it's a device for anonymously aggregating fragmented group information into a coherent accurate prediction, the lopsided bets are a feature; the only point of the market is the price signal, and the lopsided bets true up the price.
But most of us understand that prediction markets aren't that, no matter what Robin Hansen said when he was helping invent the modern incarnation of things like Polymarket and Kalshi. They're gambling venues, and we have "Nevada Gaming Commission"-style concerns about fairness. To me, the next logical step is to say that they should be heavily regulated, but in the era of DraftKings, that seems off the table.
> it just drives investors to actual gambling because they cant get the exposure they were already looking for
This argument gets trotted out by Wall Street every decade or so, usually under the guise of "democratising" some piece of finance. It's almost always bunk.
Most investment capital is looking for safe returns. It's not competing with gambling. Even within the high-risk end of finance, the game is in turning that high risk into above-market but predictable returns through portfolio mechanics. (Fuckups aside, you can't generally portfolio mechanic your way out of the negative expectated value of a lottery ticket.)
More simply: the notion that we need to increase risk and profitiabilty for intermediaries in investments to keep people from gamblig is a false economy. Gamblers are seeking a different thrill from what financial markets are designed to provide. To the degree we have a problem, it's in letting our markets look more like casinos.
> exposure they were already looking for
Broadly speaking, if you want exposure to the economy you're investing. If you want exposure to a number that goes up, you're gambling. This is an overly-simplistic delineation. But it works for first-order estimates.
The punch line may well be that he wasn't joking after all.
> The kernel, the memory manager and device drivers, the language runtimes for managed languages; would these not be written in "systems" languages?
The kernel and memory manager: probably yes, the device drivers: not necessarily, the language runtimes for managed languages: not necessarily.
> On a different note: why should the kernel even handle IPC or scheduling?
Because any other solution will quickly run into chicken-and-the-egg style problems.
> Those take the basic capabilities of context switching, timer management, and memory management.
Yes. But only one timer, the rest should be free to use by other applications.
> Even "core functionality" can be a context switch (or a few) away; is a syscall not just a message to a system server?
No. A syscall is usually defined as a call to a ring one level in from the one where you currently are. But lots of things that are syscalls right now do not necessarily have to be.
> Only the most basic form of communication is necessary to delegate arbitrary functionality, so a true microkernel should only introduce that as an abstraction.
Indeed. And they do.
> Everything else either follows from the hardware or is left to the whims of software.
A lot of the stuff that 'follows from the hardware' can be dealt with at the application level.
So clearly the market isn't efficiently priced.
> Almost all the comments acting like this is some truth bombshell, like people in trumpistan all thought raising tariffs magically made the us economy better. This is a straw man, no?
No. It isn’t.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/09/politics/fact-check-trump-van...
> “She is a liar. She makes up crap … I am going to put tariffs on other countries coming into our country, and that has nothing to do with taxes to us. That is a tax on another country,” Trump said.
> Vance said in late August that as a result of tariffs Trump imposed during his presidency, “prices went down for American citizens.”
I'm getting some really skeezy ads for prediction markets on TikTok at the moment, the message is effectively "hey, are you broke? earn $50+/day on Kalshi!"
> What were you thinking? What was going through your heads? I'm genuinely curious.
I know two people who voted for him.
Person one has voted Democrat her whole life. Has worked for the Democratic Party. Has a son who was a Democratic elected official. But she lives in Texas, and watches too much local news, and believed that murderous immigrants were pouring over the border, guns blazing, taking out innocent American citizens daily at the beach and grocery store. So she voted for him because she believed only he could stop this from happening.
Person two is a wealthy white boomer. His business already runs in America. He actually has an advanced degree in economics. He believed that the tariffs would only be used surgically by smart people to protect American business. He is not personally affected by any of the racist policies or any of the other shenanigans. So he voted for him because he liked the protectionist and tax cut policies.
He regrets his vote. I haven't spoken to her in months because she stopped talking to me when I kept show her that her "facts" were made up.
Make me think of the book
https://www.franklincovey.com/books/the-speed-of-trust/
which has a profound message is manifestly true (e.g. of course you have been in an organization which was slow because people didn't trust each other) but can't be separated from the ® mark at the end of "Speed of Trust ®", that is, people can't help to be cynical of that kind of message as soon as you put it in a marketing frame.
See also: the fate of Stack Overflow. R.I.P.
People love being lied to like that, though.
Yes, but please remember you specify the common parts only once for the agent. From there, it’ll base its actions on all the instructions you kept on their configuration.
Me too. I actually bought a selection of freshly roasted beans from a local roaster, and when I came back I said that I could not distinguish the Peruvian one from the somewhere else one. The roaster was shocked.
I‘d love to have better taste, but I‘m saving so much money, I do not really care.
The fact it could have worked probably weighted in the decision to sponsor the coup and the regime that destroyed its legacy.
A real shame.
I will confirm what the person you replied to said. I have had white collar colleagues and blue collar truck drivers (one who is a family member) say the same thing, that they wouldn’t vote for a women. You severely underestimate racism and misogyny in the US electorate imho.
I did not bother canvassing or donating to the Harris campaign for this reason, for the same reason I did not help pro vaccine non profits during the pandemic trying to convince antivaxxers. You aren’t changing someone’s belief system and mental model on timelines that matter for election outcomes. Mamdani was able to win NYC because young people and women turned out in force and ranked choice voting. The electoral college overweights rural, lower education parts of the country in US voting influence.
Based on the above, it will be a long time before enough of the US electorate has turned over before you can run a women presidential candidate imho. 78% of farmers voted for him, and still support him, even as he destroys their way of life, for example. Progress occurs one funeral at a time (Planck).
I recommend the recently released book “The Vanishing Church: How the Hollowing Out of Moderate Congregations is Hurting Democracy, Faith, and Us” by Ryan P Burge (ISBN13 9781587436697) as a contributor to understanding this topic, as well as “Everybody Lies: Big Data, New Data, and What the Internet Can Tell Us About Who We Really Are” by Seth Stephens-Davidowitz (ISBN13 9780062390851).
Edit: This comment https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46681760 touches on this as well.
Is there a way to stay up to date with what you are doing?
It very much aligns with how I've approached hardware since I was 15 and had a massive stack of functional blocks of electronics circuitry that I would combine in all kinds of ways. I've lost the 3x5's, but I still work that way, build a simple block, test it, build another block, test that, hook the one to the other etc.
To the contrary. At least in my area, there are more items with 1-day shipping than ever before.
A few years ago, most stuff was 2-day. Now most stuff is 1-day. And it's constantly popping up options for same-day too.
We usually critique the movie after the end titles roll.
Isn't that exactly the point of tariffs? To decrease import volumes so local industry can fill the gap and compete?
https://www.newgeography.com/content/008650-below-replacemen...
We are almost at worldwide sub replacement rate.
> This is the case with any tax, it's mostly paid by the consumer
Not true. Tax burdens can fall incredibly unequally depending on market dynamics.
NVIDIA are "legitimate", so anything they do is fine, while AA are "illegitimate", so it's not.
"Around Annapurna" with Mountain Travel in the early 1980s. I was in terrific shape (at sea level) and thus very surprised at how hard I was breathing after running 100 meters on the Thorong La Pass at 18,000 feet.
I would assert this is affecting all programming languages, this is like the transition from Assembly to high level languages.
Who thinks otherwise, even if LLMs are still a bit dumb today, is fooling themselves.
Many of us became software engineers precisely to neglect our soft skills (or lack thereof)
This is the problem with the "nuclear is completely safe" people: there's only one biosphere, and anything you put in it eventually ends up very thinly spread everywhere.
This isn’t a problem —- it’s a catastrophe.
Greenpeace got their start against nuclear weapons and nuclear waste dumping at sea.
I don't think it's entirely appropriate to ignore the risks of nuclear in the country that contains Chernobyl, and another different nuclear plant which is quite close to the front lines and was shut down by capture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaporizhzhia_Nuclear_Power_Pla...
> If you want to use OpenWV, you must obtain an appropriate wvd file yourself, and copy it to /etc/openwv/widevine_device.wvd
Ah ok then.
It is kind of interesting that C inventors, contrary to the folks that worship C, not only did not care about ANSI/ISO compatibility, they ended up exploring Aleph, Limbo and Go.
While Bell Labs eventually started Cyclone, which ended up influencing Rust.
Show me the code that's using other packages for the heavy lifting of implementing the layout engine.
As long as it depends on Google paying upstream development that GrapheneOS updates from, it is tied to Google.
Now if GrapheneOS was its own thing without additional AOSP code updates.
As immortalised in the 1978 song "Greased Ligthnin'" from the film Grease:
Well, this car is automatic
It's systematic
It's hydromatic
Why it's greased lightnin' (greased lightnin')
> International law has no enforcement mechanism
International law has a number of enforcement mechanisms.
> it depends on willingness of countries to follow it or force others to.
All law depends on the willingness of its subjects to follow it, and failing that of its other subjects to force them to. This is not unique to international law.
Some systems of law (e.g., typical modern national criminal law) may have a particular group of people (usually with a formal heirarchy) who are expected to do the executive part of enforcement, and a similar (possibly the same or overlapping, but often distinct) group of people employed to do the adjudicative part of enforccement. International law has the latter (in several forms), but lacks the former. But anyone who is familiar with more than a narrow range of the most idealistic systems of national law will be aware that that that executive body can be a single point of failure—the real problem with international law isn't that it lacks such a single dedicated executive body, but that the important issues under it frequently involve significant conflicts of interest for any of the groups with the capacity to take on the executive role in the particular case, which is problematic under any system of law whether it has a single dedicated body for the executive part of enforcement or whether it relies on ad hoc case-by-case posses for that purpose.
Wrong takeaway. There are plenty of real incidents. The reason for posting fake incidents is to discredit the real ones.
"Unlimited" PTO is an oddity that can only exist when you don't have statutory minimums.
https://www.gov.uk/holiday-entitlement-rights "Almost all people classed as workers are legally entitled to 5.6 weeks’ paid holiday a year (known as statutory leave entitlement or annual leave)."
Yes, there are two modes, Hyper-V isolation and process isolation, which is similar to how Linux does it.
The kernel version has to do with process isolation not being fully there when Windows containers were initially supported, so they had the limitation the container kernel dependency had to match the host version.
Since Windows 11 this has been relaxed.
The namespacing approach is based on Jobs API.
Modern Windows security relies on several sandboxed components, Hyper-V is always running anyway, also one of the reasons of the updated harware requirements, while this configuration is optional on Windows 10, it is always enabled on Windows 11.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/design/de...
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/b...
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/hardware-...
We on the other hand were shipping software on Aix, HP-UX, Solaris and Windows NT/2000.
As MSFT partner, we also started our voyage to port the GUI frontends into the newly introduced .NET.
We used Red-Hat Linux internally for our CVS server, MP3 music shares and Quake lan parties.
That is how seriously we look at Linux in 2002.
The vibe coders will weed out, but programming with AI is never going away.
> if you show them two colors and ask them if they are different, they will tell you no
The experiments I've seen seem to interrogate what the culture means by colour (versus shade, et cetera) more than what the person is seeing.
If you show me sky blue and Navy blue and ask me if they're the same colour, I'll say yes. If you ask someone in a different context if Russian violet and Midnight blue are the same colour, I could see them saying yes, too. That doesn't mean they literally can't see the difference. Just that their ontology maps the words blue and violet to sets of colours differently.
> Briar is being used in Iran right now
Do we have evidence of this? The only concrete claim made in that post is that Briar 'hit 252 points on Hacker News," which is orthogonal to if it's actually being used.
> it's worth a lot to have someone that can tackle hard problems
Oh, absolutely. My point is those personalities are almost common in the military and academia. They’re rarer in commerce because there aren’t that many niches where hard problems exist independent of peoples’ preferences. (As in, choosing how to scope the hard problem is part of what makes it hard. And the scoping that works best isn’t going to be found in isolation from customers and others working on the problem.)
I like that saying. You can see it all the time on Reddit where, not even counting AI generated content, you see rage bait that is (re)posted literally years after the fact. It's like "yeah, OK this guy sucks, but why are you reposting this 5 years after it went viral?"
Corporations love copyright. I don't see why "supports broad copyright violations" and "go fully corporate" fit together here.
Corey Doctorow wrote about that recently: https://pluralistic.net/2025/12/05/pop-that-bubble/#u-washin...
He's not a generative AI fan at all, but he argues that if artists think tightening up copyright law to make it harder to train models is a good idea they're going to find themselves strengthening the very corporate overlords that they've been trying to escape.
If nobody used em-dashes, they wouldn’t have featured heavily in the training set for LLMs. It is used somewhat rarely (so e people use it a lot, others not at all) in informal digital prose, but that’s not the same as being entirely unused generally.
The risk isn't from the AI labs. It's from malicious attackers who sneak instructions to coding agents that cause them to steal your data, including your environment variable secrets - or cause them to perform destructive or otherwise harmful actions using the permissions that you've granted to them.
...when they come off the tracks.
a high-speed train travelling from Malaga to Madrid derailed and crossed over onto another track
This looks familiar to people who have seen how the more elaborate NPC systems work in major multiplayer games. There are lots of semi-independent NPCs, with some degree of overall coordination. Groups of cops or soldiers may have a commander program for tactical coordination, and there may be a higher level system deploying units for strategic purposes.
In games, what the NPCs can do is usually rather dumb. Move and shoot is usually most of their functionality. This keeps the overhead down so the system is affordable.
Gas Town may be a step towards AIs which have an ongoing sense of what they're doing. I'm not going to get into the "consciousness" debate, but it's closer to liveness.
The opposing side is getting paid, not getting fleeced.
> For the last decade, an average of 1,300 trains derailed each year (in the US), accounting for 61% of all train accidents.
https://usafacts.org/articles/are-train-derailments-becoming...
> In 2024, there were 1,507 significant railway accidents in the EU, with a total of 750 people killed and 548 seriously injured.
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php...
It's not the same, though.
The parent comment shows two rows of different types - the upper row consists of the taskbar, and the lower row has the quick launch icons, drive links, and a music bar.
Quite an interesting layout, imho.
> One of the key arguments is that Congress can't take that power away from him. For example, Congress can't tell him that he can't fire executive-branch staff, because the executive power rests with him, not with Congress.
Just want to comment what an incredibly piss poor argument that is, because if you take it to its conclusion, it means all of the power rests with the Executive and none with the Legislature. That is, by definition, the Executive branch has all the people that actually "do stuff". If the executive has full, 100% control over the structure and rules of the branch, why bother even having a legislature in the first place if all the laws can be conveniently ignored or "reinterpreted".
You could argue Congress still has the power of impeach if they believe laws aren't being faithfully excited, but I'd argue that is much too much of a blunt instrument to say that laws should be able to constrain what a President can do within the executive branch.
Does it matter? The closer they get to being indistinguishable from Windows, the better.
“Maintenance Manager Checker Agent is not a noun Yegge employs”, it is Brinker’s term for Yegge’s “Boot the Dog”.
I do too, but you can take things too far, which I'd argue has happened the moment "figuring out what the names mean" becomes enough of an intellectual challenge to provide a dopamine hit; at that point, you've (intentionally or otherwise) germinated a cult. It's human nature: people will support the design not on its merits but rather as loss aversion for the work they put into decoding it.
DjangoCon has a policy to not use the term "soft skills" and instead classify them as "professional skills" - communication and collaboration and management and leadership.
I think they're 100% right about that. There's nothing easy or soft about what gets classified as "soft skills".
Because of the fraud scandal and the concentration of cases among the Somali community there (that those people are generally citizens and not immigrants or refugees is besides the point to the administration). The MN fraud story is a huge big deal in conservative media.
> which case are you referring?
The example given at the top of the article. We want Tangle or whatever used idiotically to strike down its use in federal court.
short answer: they don't know, but there are three options:
- American bonds, while bad, are better than other developing countries
- we may have lower future interest rates due to slowing growth
- the market could be making a mistake
What's hilarious about language like:
And it's costing them hundreds of dollars per workflow — not because the idea is bad, but because the workflow shape is.
> The first shot was through the windshield and the. she turned the wheel and the second two shots were fired through the side window as she was turning away.
Video clearly shows the wheels were cut before forward motion started.
> The officer suffered bruised ribs from the impact of the vehicle.
This seems to be an attempt to rewrite the laughably false “internal bleeding” anonymous propaganda leak CBS news laundered into something remotely credible; there is literally no reason to believe this true, and clear reasons to dismiss it, including video showing thet except for maybe his hand reaching toward the vehicle as it passed, no part of his body was impacted.
> previous revolt happened for a reason
It also happened over three decades ago.
I’m not saying airing the Pavlavis is a great idea. But I wouldn’t assume it’s negative without evidence.
> you may be worried about which box you belong in. ;)
There’s also the risk someone very loud decides to put you in a box you don’t belong in. Eventually you are able to demonstrate it, but, in the meantime, you need to deal with the consequences.
Law of war training for new troops was eliminated back in April.[1] The core concept that members of the US military have a duty to resist illegal orders is no longer taught to troops.
Recall Trump's comments after several US members of Congress made a video along the lines of "you must refuse illegal orders." Trump called this "seditious behavior, punishable by DEATH!"[2]
[1] https://www.veterannews.org/veteran-news/army-eliminates-sev...
[2] https://www.npr.org/2025/11/20/nx-s1-5615190/trump-democrats...
It's more noise than signal because it's disorganized, and hard to glean value from it (speaking from experience).
For me it felt more like higher detail version of Teardown, the voxel-based 3d demolition game. Sure it's splats and not voxels, but the camera and the lighting give this strong voxel game vibe.
It won't help. LLMs are good at soft skills, too. There's a whole "AI girlfriend" industry, and it's quite successful.
It is absolutely not illegal in the US to use IQ tests to hire. This is a persistent Internet myth.
Maybe, but you won't be able to test all behaviors and you won't have enough time to try a million alternatives. Just because of the number of possibilities, it'll be faster to just read the code.